Feb 13
Our Second Top Coder Competition
icon1 lukejduncan | icon2 TopCoder | icon4 February 13, 2009| icon3No Comments »

Tonight ACM members competed in our second Top Coder competition.  With the busy part of the semester beginning we again had two members, Luke Duncan and Dennis Matveyev. Two members wished us well at before the competition but were unable to compete, Tony Wesley and Kasey Thompson.  Thanks for the support guys. 

Below, Denis discusses his first experience at a Top Coder competition. 

“So .. wow ! 

I have a multitude of feelings about this contest (TopCoder), and I’ve only started competing 2 hours ago !

First, some background — I’ve been involved with ACM regional contests since 2004! Now, I see that all the time I’ve spend practicing for ACM is trumped by doing TopCoder contests! For ACM I used to solve problems from previous ACM’s contests, but TopCoder times you and lets you really butt heads with your peers and lets you do so better than ACM contest — at TopCoder you can see other contestants’ code!! (after the contest is over, of course!) 

I feel that had I practiced with TopCoder, besides getting better on TopCoder, I’d do better on ACM and other contests in general! 

Seeing other contestant’s code is AWESOME !! This was always a mystery for me at ACM contests. I managed to peek at Waterloo’s code at an ACM contest and it was the top of the tops for me. TopCoder makes looking at other contestant’s code routine.

So, my impressions of the contest at TC (TopCoder) as coming from ACM regionals background:
* First, I was afraid, very afraid to compete. Ok, I was not afraid, I was hesitant. Luke, thanks for pulling me out and having me compete. Here’s a task for you: kidnap people and have them compete at TopCoder as their way to get back home. I was hesitant because I did not want to break my ACM regional mode, but I am happy it’s broken now!
* Being used to ACM contests, I did not know how to submit problems for TC contest. Turns out you need to write a class and use exact methods provided to you. Also, there should be no main() function when you submit. This is just a contest set up slightly differently than ACM. ”

Jan 21

Our first official ACM TopCoder competition was a relative success.  Today’s competition drew two ACM members: myself and Tony Wesley.  Unfortunately, Tony wasn’t able to register for the competition in time and didn’t officially compete but still worked the problems. We’ll continue to meet for future Single Round Matches and hope to grow the group.  We’re looking to create an informal environment for members to compete, show-off, hone, refine, or even discover their programming skills.  If that sounds like something you’re interested in email Luke at ljduncan@umd.umich.edu.  The next competition will be on Saturday, February 7th, at noon.  A full schedule of competitions can be found here.

Tony worked and compiled the 250 point problem.  Since he didn’t officially compete he wasn’t ranked.

Luke submitted the 250 point problem, compiled the second problem, and successfully challenged 1 problem.  Unfortunately Luke’s first problem didn’t pass the system testing.  Luke finished 15th out of 20 in his division 1 competition room.

The big lesson learned today was to read the problem statement carefully.  The 250-point problem was easy, if you read it correctly.  The problem is as follows:

Once upon a time, there was a kingdom where math was always a big problem. When the post of the royal treasurer needed to be filled, applicants were presented with the following problem:  “We have two arrays of integers, A and B. A and B each contain exactly N elements. Let’s define a function S over A and B:

S = A0*B0 + … + AN-1*BN-1

Rearrange the numbers in A in such a way that the value of S is as small as possible. You are not allowed to rearrange the numbers in B.”  The problem writers need a program to check the correctness of the applicants’ answers. Given vector <int>s A and B, return the smallest possible value for S.

Note the statement: “You are not allowed to rearrange the numbers in B.”  This DOES NOT mean that the algorithm cannot rearrange the numbers in B.  It simply means that the citizens whom the law applies to cannot.  Understanding that is the difference between spending 20 minutes and spending 2 minutes on the problem.

Once the official Problem Set & Analysis is uploaded to TopCoder a link will be added to the post.

Jan 20

It is hard to believe that the first week of classes is nearly at an end, and with this new semester comes a new set of ACM officers and a new meeting schedule. Well, we at the ACM want to welcome you all back in style, so at the next meeting on Wednesday, January 21st at 3:30pm in the 1st floor conference room in the CIS building we are supplying the snacks, you just have to supply the warm bodies (yours, preferably, but feel free to bring a friend!)

The agenda for this meeting includes:

  • Bringing MPCon back to Dearborn
  • An ACM Ted conference
  • TopCoder competitions
  • Starting up an ACM Test Bank
  • The need for on-air personalities for a WUMD radio show
  • The upcoming programming competition

Whatever YOU want to see the ACM do for you

So we hope to see you there! Email me if you have any questions.

Upcoming Events:

  • January 21, tomorrow, join ACM President Anthony Wesley and Treasurer Luke Duncan in a Top Coder competition. (click here for more information)
  • February 11th is the date of the ACM’s second Programming Competition (click here for more information). Snacks and instructions start at 5pm in lab CIS 139, with the contest to follow at 6pm.
  • Remember, if you plan on submitting a program for the High School Programming Competition, all submissions are due in to Dr. Elenbogen by February 28th.
Dec 9
Meeting Minutes - December 3, 2008
icon1 Jer Lance | icon2 Meeting Minutes | icon4 December 9, 2008| icon3Comments Off

Officers Present:
Cardi DeMonaco, Jr. (President), Scott Hoffman (Secretary), Pablo Garcia (Treasurer)

UMD Programming Competition:
We are ready to put on the competition this evening. Fifteen people have signed up, and eleven of them have responded to the most recent email. Dennis has picked up trophies for first, second, and third places. Currently, the competition is about $30 over budget.

We discussed the next event briefly. This is something that we desire to do each semester; perhaps next semester’s could take place in February. One idea for next year’s prizes, something functional (like flash drives?) instead of trophies?

Game Day:
Game day was a huge success, we added many names to the email list and picked up a few new memberships.This is definitely something we want to repeat next semester near the end as another “study break”. There was some discussion of including a LAN party component or the game club in the next iteration. We should set a date soon and get this on the various event calendars.

Conference:
The notion of a trip to a regional conference for ACM members was discussed. This was something that has not happened in a long time, and there is definite interest in starting this back up. The new officers will have to discuss the specifics, so this will be tabled until the next meeting in January.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day of Service:
On Martin Luther King Day (January 19, 2009), will coordinate in service projects all over the Metro area. ACM is getting together in a group to take part. If you wish to join us, register on the web (http://www.umd.umich.edu/mlk) and choose “Associate for Computing Machinery” for the group name. Remember, no matter how big or small, you can make a difference in a person’s life.

Registration for the Day of Service ends on December 19th, and space is limited so we encourage you to register as soon as possible.  If you have any questions regarding the Day of Service, you may contact Jon Larson, Student Activities Supervisor, at jonalars@umd.umich.edu or via telephone at 313-593-5667.

Brochures:
The open source brochures seem to be a huge hit, and definitely have been getting passed around. We should create more brochures, so if anyone has ideas, email them to acm@engin.umd.umich.edu or bring them to the next meeting. Additionally, Cardi is going to check into a possible monthly column on the Michigan Journal.

T-Shirts:
Still no ideas on a design, so tabled until the next meeting.

Resume Workshop:
We would like to put on a resume writing workshop. Cardi is going to try to get in contact with his guest speaker and make the necessary arrangements. He will report back to us one way or another.

Next Meeting:
The new officers will have to establish a meeting time for next semester. Tentative date is Monday, January 12 in the afternoon.

Winter 2009 Officers:
Congratulations to the new officers who will serve for the Winter 2009 semester, and thank you to the officers that served this last semester. Great job, guys!

  • President: Anthony Wesley
  • Vice President: Trevor Tabaka
  • Treasurer: Luke Duncan
  • Secretary: Jeremy Lance

The ACM wishes everyone a safe and happy break, and looks forward to seeing everyone in January! Feedback should be sent to acm@engin.umd.umich.edu.

Dec 3
Fall 2008 Programming Contest Final Report
icon1 admin | icon2 Programming Competition | icon4 December 3, 2008| icon3Comments Off

The Fall 2008 University of Michigan-Dearborn Chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery Programming Contest

Final Report

December 3, 2008

The University of Michigan-Dearborn Chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery Programming Contest was held on Wednesday, December 3, 2008.  We had 14 students participate.  The contest was held in the CIS Building on the University of Michigan-Dearborn campus from 5:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

1. Version 8.7 of the PC^2 Contest Control System was used to run the contest.  There were no technical problems and the actual contest went very smooth.  The problems discovered during the practice competition were fixed before the start of the actual contest.

2. The contest started at 18:07:21 and ended at 21:07:22 for a duration of 3 hours.

3. The contest consisted of 5 problems with 9 students solving at least one problem.

4. The maximum number of problems solved was 4 problems.

Final Standings

Rank Name A B C D E Solved Penalty
marble blue orange green yellow
1 David Lawrenchuk 1/133 2/29 1/39 1/92 2/– 4 313
2 Dmitriy Ansolis 1/24 1/41 1/163 3 228
3 Jason Eaton 1/71 2/129 1/101 3 321
4 Cale Colony 2/19 12/166 4/126 3 611
5 Randy Foster 1/33 2/– 1 33
6 Jeremy White 1/37 3/– 1 37
7 Jon Smereka 4/72 7/– 1 132
8 Chaz Tinskey 1/– 2/134 2/– 1 154
9 Gierad Laput 2/168 1/– 4/– 1 188
10 Anthony Wesley 0 0
10 Brian McClure 3/– 0 0
10 John Papke 5/– 0 0
10 Tom Kowalski 2/– 0 0
10 Tony Tahmouch 1/– 0 0

Number of correct and incorrect solutions by problem

Problem Total Correct Incorrect % Correct
A. Short on Cheese 3 2 1 66.66%
B. Pass or Feil 22 9 13 40.90%
C. Stuck In Traffic 33 4 29 12.12%
D. Wordy Calculator 9 3 6 33.33%
E. Think Inside The Box 6 0 6 0.00%
TOTALS 73 18 55 24.65%

Problem Sets and Judges’ Solutions

Actual problem set (pdf)

Problem Actual Input Expected Output Judges’ Solution
A A.in.txt A.out.txt C++ Another C++
B B.in.txt B.out.txt C++ Another C++
C C.in.txt C.out.txt C++ Another C++
D D.in.txt D.out.txt C++
E E.in.txt E.out.txt C++ Another C++

Many thanks to Dennis Matveyev, Scott Hoffman, Pablo Garcia, Cardi DeMonaco Jr., Jer Lance, Vince Shaw, Tony Wesley, and Louis McHugh for all of their hard work and effort in making the first programming contest a huge success!

« Previous Entries